DETAIL KOLEKSI

Studi komparasi kelayakan sistem kontrak PSC Cost Recovery dengan gross split pada lapangan Z


Oleh : Muhammad Edrus Alaydrus

Info Katalog

Nomor Panggil : 928/TP/2018

Penerbit : FTKE - Usakti

Kota Terbit : Jakarta

Tahun Terbit : 2018

Pembimbing 1 : Asri Nugrahanti

Pembimbing 2 : Pri Agung Rakhmanto

Subyek : Oil and gas exploration activities;Production sharing contract

Kata Kunci : cost recovery, gross split


File Repositori
No. Nama File Ukuran (KB) Status
1. 2018_TA_TM_071001400191__HALAMAN-JUDUL.pdf 1538.45
2. 2018_TA_TM_071001400191_BAB-1.pdf 655.99
3. 2018_TA_TM_071001400191_BAB-2.pdf 1406.79
4. 2018_TA_TM_071001400191_BAB-3.pdf 967.8
5. 2018_TA_TM_071001400191__BAB-4.pdf 1060.24
6. 2018_TA_TM_071001400191_BAB-5.pdf 625.29
7. 2018_TA_TM_071001400191__DAFTAR-PUSTAKA.pdf 665.89
8. 2018_TA_TM_071001400191__LAMPIRAN.pdf 707.41

D Di Indonesia terdapat dua jenis sistem kontrak yang dapat digunakan untukkegiatan migas yaitu Production Sharing Contract (PSC) Cost Recovery dan PSCGross Split. Gross Split yang baru saja diluncurkan melalui Permen ESDM No.08Tahun 2017 dan direvisi dengan Permen ESDM No.52 Tahun 2017 adalah sistemkontrak yang terhitung baru. Dalam skema Gross Split, komponen Cost Recoveryditiadakan. Berdasarkan hasil analisa data dan perhitungan yang telah dilakukan,didapatkan hasil perhitungan keekonomian lapangan Z dengan menggunakan duasistem kontrak yaitu sistem kontrak PSC Cost Recovery dan sistem kontrak PSCGross Split. Hasil perhitungan tersebut menunjukkan bahwa, pada lapangan Z ini,sistem kontrak PSC Gross Split memiliki hasil yang lebih baik dibandingkandengan PSC Cost Recovery dengan hasil pendapatan bersih kontraktor sebesar113,11 juta US Dollar dibandingkan dengan PSC Gross Split dengan hasil sebesar91,179 juta US Dollar. Selain itu, hasil perhitungan Net Present Value (NPV), PayOut Time (POT), dan Internal Rate of Return (IRR) pada sistem kontrak PSC GrossSplit juga lebih baik dibandingkan dengan PSC Cost Recovery.

I In Indonesia there are two types of contract systems that can be used for oil and gas activities namely Production Sharing Contract (PSC) Cost Recovery andPSC Gross Split. Gross Split which has just been launched through ESDM Ministerial No.08 of 2017 and revised by the Minister of Energy and MineralResources No. 52 of 2017 is a new contract system. In the Gross Split scheme, theCost Recovery component is eliminated. Based on the results of data analysis andcalculations that have been done, obtained the calculation of the economics of fieldZ by using two contracting system contract system PSC Cost Recovery and contractsystem PSC Gross Split. The calculation results show that, in this Z field, PSC GrossSplit contract system has better results compared to PSC Cost Recovery with netrevenue of contractor of 113,11 million US Dollar compared with PSC Gross Splitwith result of 91,179 million US Dollar. In addition, the Net Present Value (NPV),Pay Out Time (POT), and Internal Rate of Return (IRR) results in PSC Gross Splitcontract system is also better than PSC Cost Recovery

Bagaimana Anda menilai Koleksi ini ?